Friday, May 16, 2008

Epiphany Watch, Peggy Noonan Version
By: Mark W Adams


I don't know if Peggy Noonan ever read any of Bob Altemeyer's study of the authoritarian personalities that are the heart and soul of the conservative Republican political infrastructure, but sometime in the last several months of reading the scribbling on the White House walls, she's reached the beginning of understanding why the current incarnation of the GOP coalition was doomed, eventually, to fail.
Mr. Bush has squandered the hard-built paternity of 40 years. But so has the party, and so have its leaders. If they had pushed away for serious reasons, they could have separated the party's fortunes from the president's. This would have left a painfully broken party, but they wouldn't be left with a ruined "brand," as they all say, speaking the language of marketing. And they speak that language because they are marketers, not thinkers. Not serious about policy. Not serious about ideas. And not serious about leadership, only followership,"
I say she's only reached the beginning of understanding. The key here the last sentence, and it bears repeating: ... not serious about leadership, only followership.

Tim the Soldier reminded me of the words of Paul Wellstone, who while using the word "politics," really was talking about leadership, or rather the ideal of leadership:
"Politics is not about power. Politics is not about money. Politics is not about winning for the sake of winning. Politics is about the improvement of people's lives. It's about advancing the cause of peace and justice in our country and the world. Politics is about doing well for the people."
The leadership of the conservative movement, now gasping for air, never once led with any sense of altruism -- ever. Power for power's sake, for money, for winning simply to "prove" they were every bit as good as the "elites" they scoff at who think they know better. Winning not to lead a better way forward, but simply so the other guys lose.

Peace, justice? Making life better for everyone? If life in the early 21st Century has shown us anything so far, it's that these concepts are the antithesis of Republican Party rule.

40 years ago, a much more thoughtful and principled Senator represented the State of Arizona than the current aging incarnation. When Barry Goldwater was the icon of conservative leadership, there was a consciousness to the party. His last noble act was to inform Nixon that the thuggery that had usurped the conservatives' cause and betrayed the nation was through.

Nixon was gone, but his thugs and misanthropes stayed on in the party leadership, one of whom holds the record for the longest serving Defense Secretary whose answer to GOP electoral disappointments is not to govern more effectively but to invite an attack against our country's interests; and another who picked himself as the nation's most powerfully sinister Vice President. The intellectual soul of the party, unfortunately, (more interested in good politics in the Wellstone tradition) were relegated to mere tools used by the factions that cared more about "winning" than governing. Peggy Noonan was and is one such useful tool.

The hard-built paternity of 40 years that Noonan eulogizes was effectively neutered the day they allowed a win-at-all-cost criminal like Nixon to take control of an authoritarian political culture that survives more on loyalty than lofty ideals. Promoting incompetent politicians who can act the part, and do it well as long as they have good writers like Noonan authoring the script, they never understood that "big" government or "liberal" government is not the enemy of the people. Bad, incompetent, corrupt government is the insidious evil that can destroy a nation and it's society. Real leadership can cure that sickness.

Noonan has taken a first step, but has a long way to go to understand that this former Reagan speech writer is just the other side of the coin that laid the stench on America's body politic. Her old boss was given pass after pass, defended vehemently by Peggy herself for betraying the Constitution and conservative orthodoxy, making deals with terrorists, conducting illegal wars, "fixing" illegal immigration through amnesty and never enforcing the laws against employers who created the demand for cheap labor in the first place -- and living in a perpetual "Senior Moment."

I doubt seriously that Noonan will ever get to the point where she will acknowledge that the doddering buffoon she and her friends spent so much effort lionizing wasn't really "leader" they believed him to be. Ronald Reagan was an opportunist, like Nixon before him and the two Bushes who followed, and every bit the pandering flip-flopper the Republics collectively are holding their nose and offering up as a sacrifice to the political gods today.

Come on, Reagan was a union president and a Democrat before he saw a clearer path to power as a Republican and in his first major act as President busted the Air Traffic Controllers Union. Call him many things, but someone who stood on long standing principles he most definitely was not.

Peggy's recognized that in a party with no leaders, just opportunists and blind followers, there is a dim future. What she many never come to terms with, much to her unending confusion, is that she was merely 18 years old when the thousand points of light that illuminate that shining city on the hill started going out one-by-one. Now there's none left.

Read More...

Wet Panties Department Store ... ies
By: Mark W Adams


Pammy Atlas, always good for a laugh to those of us who enjoy making fun of Kool Aide drinking, mentally deranged wingnuts, is so "freaking terrified of Obamanation nomination," she has implored "all decent Democrats to come to their senses," and either overturn the results of all the primaries to date and nominate Hillary Clinton, some how, some way -- or follow Hillary in a third party bid for the Presidency.
If Hillary Clinton loses the Democratic nomination, she should abandon
the Democrats as the party of appeasement and defeat, and make a
third-party run for the White House. She owes it to herself and her
country to seriously consider this option. Her party could be truly
progressive in the best sense of the term--a voice for the middle class
and the working poor, a party rooted in traditional Democratic values,
including a strong stand on defense and security.

Leaving aside the fact that this swooning neocon harpie was not to long ago smearing Senator Clinton as a lesbian with a muslim girlfriend, (and in Pammy's world, there is no greater sin than being a muslim, unless you are a mulim-o-nazi appeaser), I really have to ask: ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME?!?!?

Convinced as she is that Barack Obama is a super-secret Islamic stealth weapon of mass deception, the next 4 to 8 years of President Obama's terms in office should provide endless entertainment as goof-balls like this nut case completely melt down.

Hey Pam, Sweety! Next time the Democrats need some advice, uh ... don't call us, we'll call you.

Read More...

Most Insidious Bushism To Date
By: Mark W Adams


Slate's Jacob Weisberg has tracked the verbal train-wrecks that emanate from Commander Guy's pie-hole. But this is one for the ages ...
"I'll be long gone before some smart person ever figures out what
happened inside this Oval Office.
"—Washington, D.C., May 12, 2008
I hope I live long enough to see the day.

Indeed, I hope George W. Bush lives long enough that if History hasn't quite got around to judging him, at least a jury of his peers will have the opportunity.

Read More...

Yet Another Reason ...
By: Mark W Adams


... to fight for Obama and to make my dream come true of appointing John Edwards as Attorney General ... it would drive Jonah Goldberg off the edge.
... the suggestion that John Edwards would be even considered for Attorney General is horrifying. I really can't think of any mainstream political figure more inappropriate for that job than Edwards.

See, since the day Edwards bowed out of the race, I couldn't think of anyone MORE appropriate for the AG job -- and now I know my instincts were spot-on.

Seriously, can you think of someone who has been more stupid, more wrong about more things than the guy who made the absurd notion that fascism is a phenomenon of the Left the running joke of Blogtopia? [Y!Sctp!]

If this is what it will take to keep the Doughy Pantload awake at night, quaking in his pee-stained footie PJ's, I'm all the more for it.

In fact, I can think of a fairly long list of bed-wetters who should lose sleep with John Edwards in charge of the Justice Department, starting with this fool.

Read More...

From His Cold Dead Fingers
By: Mark W Adams


This is priceless.
Secret Service: No guns allowed at NRA event with John McCain

McCain's on the campaign trail in Kentucky, and he's coming after your guns.
Guns are not barred from the state-owned south wing of the Fairgrounds Convention Center and John McCain's campaign folks said it was fine with them if NRA members with valid concealed carry permits brought guns into his speech. But since our story last week, the Secret Service has stepped in.

But NRA members who walk through the doors will be greeted by metal detectors, they won't be allowed to carry in weapons, even if they have a valid concealed carry permit.

According to an NRA spokesperson, Secret Service members have stepped in and said while firearms will still be allowed in the convention center, they will not be allowed in the Celebration of American Values Forum.

Attention Hillbilly Hassassins: Plan B.

(H.T. Memorandum)

Read More...

Don't Sweat It, uh ... Sweetie?
By: Mark W Adams


Avendon reminded me of one of the Raisons d'Entre for the continuation of Hillary Clinton's campaign:
"I think she's running all the bases," I said. "She's the first woman in history to win a state primary, and she's won a lot more. She's running pretty close to the front-runner. It's a major historic moment." And the more I think about it, the more I think it has to be part of what's driving her. There's a bit of climbing the mountain because it's there, and wanting to be able to stand up in the end and say something like, "Never let it be said that a woman can't go the distance." It doesn't matter if someone else breaks the tape, just as long as she finishes the race. (And think how she'd feel if something did happen before Denver to tank Obama and she hadn't.) I've been unhappy with a lot of things about Hillary, but there's a part of me that kind of admires that. Because she wouldn't just be doing that for herself - she's doing it for every little girl who was ever told she can't.
Now that reminded me of something awkwardly pointed out by her husband -- Barack Obama wasn't the first black man to win a State's presidential primary; and this historical situation was elaborated upon by an even blunter instrument in the form of Chris Matthews -- black men we granted the vote via the 15th Amendment fully 50 years before women were enfranchised via the 19th Amendment.

From an historical perspective, Hillary has already accomplished more politically than any woman before her. There will be more, a lot more who follow the trail she's blazed. Obama has done more than any black man who came before him, but only marginally unless and until he accepts the nomination at the Democratic Convention. At that point, it can be said that both reached threshholds of truly historic proportions.

And that's saying something folks.

And we're going to do a lot better than that with the assclowns the GOP has put up for the sacrifice.

Read More...

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Did The House Of Representatives Just End The War?
By: Mark W Adams


Not quite, but this is certainly movement in the right direction.
Today, about 100 House Republicans refused to vote for more war funding, voting 'present'. They are trying to hand off the war to the Democrats, but even Democrats were able to increase their 'no' vote number on funding from 141 to 149; the bill failed. In a separate bill, Republicans also voted against timelines, for torture, and accountability for military contractors, including various elements of a Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq. This bill passed with 227 votes; last year, it passed with only 218 votes, for a gain of 9.

Finally the GI bill passed with overwhelming margin of 256 votes in the House, including 32 Republicans. It included a war surtax of one half of one percent on people making over $500k a year to pay for the GI bill, at the behest of Blue Dogs. This might actually be the most remarkable piece of the votes today; conservative Democrats agreeing to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for educational benefits for veterans.
It's nice to know that Congress has finally discovered it controls the
purse-strings, even if it hasn't figured out how they're supposed to
use them.



We've been assured by Matt Stoller that the Senate will put money for Baghdad bullets back in the bill and give the C+ Augustus enough cash to pay for more mayhem in Mesopotamia. I'm not sure how that works since the Constitution states that all revenue bills must originate in the House, not the Senate. But who pays attention to that quaint old document anymore.

All of this is begging another veto by the time it gets to the White House. And of course, that's all part of the game I guess. The sad reality is that this game costs lives every single day it plays out.

Read More...

Obama Grabs the Megaphone
By: Ara


I found this item from Greg Sargent to be very interesting and perhaps with very large consequences down the line: ...

A few weeks ago, Media Matters' David Brock announced to great fanfare that he was taking over Progressive Media USA, a third-party group that would, he vowed, raise $40 million for ads to soften up John McCain in advance of the general election.

Now the group is quietly shuttering those efforts with barely a whimper.

Barack Obama's fundraising team has been quietly putting out word to major donors that they didn't want any money to go to such third-party groups. Instead, they wanted the cash to go to the Obama campaign, so Obama advisers could be in sole control of the campaign's message.
It's a bold move on the part of the Obama campaign. No guarantee that it'll work to his benefit. On the face of it seems counter-intuitive. But I appreciate the risk he's taking -- it could pay off big.
  • It basically reinforces his message that he's not part of the same old politics, e.g., smearing your opponent by standing by the side of the road while someone else does it.

  • Also, by giving his campaign all the money to control, it makes his megaphone that much bigger.

  • Lastly, it highlights the difference between him and St. John McCain on campaign finance reform. Essentially it highlights the fact that McCain skirting the law that has his own name on it.
P.S. David Brock is probably the closest thing our generation has to producing our own Whittaker Chambers. Look it up and tell me if I'm not right.

Read More...

Bush Breaks Godwin's Law
By: Mark W Adams


UPDATE: Biden calls BULLSHIT!

I don't recall Barack Obama offering Osama bin Laden the Sudetenland (or a slice of the Afghan/Pakistan border). Did anyone catch Obama offering Hamas any Israeli territory in exchange for peace, or Hezbollah their own section of Lebanon to call their own?

No.

The fact is, Obama has said exactly the opposite:
"Obama and McCain have the same position on Hamas —no talks, no recognition, no outreach."
But mere facts have never, ever prevented George Bush and his crime family from creating a myth out of whole cloth and fighting the strawman with every ounce of venom their being.

It's not just that George Bush implied the Democrats are no better than Nazi appeasers with this bit of nonsense (via) before the Israeli Knesset ...
Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is – the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.

Some people suggest that if the United States would just break ties with Israel, all our problems in the Middle East would go away. This is a tired argument that buys into the propaganda of our enemies, and America rejects it utterly. Israel's population may be just over 7 million. But when you confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because America stands with you.
... it is an outright lie!

Unless the Dickhead in Chief is talking about Ron Paul, no legitimate office seeker in this country wants to break ties with Israel. No one is trying to appease, or psychoanalyze, or give aid and comfort to extremists and terrorists -- unless you count John McCain sucking up to homophobic, bigoted preachers ... or listening to Don Rumsfeld's solution for using terror to increase GOP loyalty.

Read More...

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

So, the Question Is ...
By: Mark W Adams


Read More...